Skip to main content
HomeComparePuck vs Tilda

Puck vs Tilda

A detailed comparison to help you choose the right tool for your needs.

Puck logo

Puck

Website Builders

Try Puck
VS
Tilda logo

Tilda

Website Builders

Try Tilda

A
About Puck

Puck is an open-source visual drag-and-drop editor designed specifically for React applications. It allows developers to embed a fully customizable page builder into their existing React or Next.js projects, giving content editors the ability to compose pages visually without writing code. Unlike hosted website builders, Puck is self-hosted, meaning teams retain complete ownership of their data and avoid vendor lock-in. It's particularly well-suited for developer teams who need to provide a CMS-like editing experience while maintaining full control over components, styling, and application architecture.

B
About Tilda

Tilda is a block-based website builder that lets users create pages by combining pre-designed content blocks or building custom layouts from scratch using a zero-code editor. It's particularly popular among designers, marketers, and small businesses who need to create landing pages, portfolios, blogs, and online stores with a strong emphasis on visual storytelling and typography. What sets Tilda apart is its focus on editorial-style design, offering over 550 pre-designed blocks and a unique Zero Block editor for pixel-perfect custom designs. The platform is widely used in the creative and startup communities, especially in Europe and Russia where it originated.

Pricing Comparison

Tool
Puck
Tilda
Price
Free (open-source)
Free — From $10/mo
Category
Website Builders
Website Builders
Rating
3.8 (28)
3.9 (17)
Free Plan
No
No
Integrations
8+ apps
8+ apps
Founded
2023
2014

Feature Comparison

Feature
Puck
Tilda
Drag-and-drop editing
React component-based
Next.js App Router support
Custom field types
Inline editing
Responsive preview
Plugin system
Self-hosted
TypeScript support
Zero vendor lock-in
Pre-designed block library for quick setup
Responsive design for mobile optimization
Customizable typography and color schemes
Built-in SEO tools for better visibility
Integration with Google Analytics for tracking
E-commerce functionality for online stores

Choose Puck

Open-source visual drag-and-drop editor for React apps

Try Puck Free

Read full review

Choose Tilda

Create stunning websites effortlessly with Tilda's intuitive drag-and-drop builder.

Try Tilda Free

Read full review

Not sure which to pick?

Get a personalized recommendation in 10 seconds.

Score Comparison

Ease of Use
8.0
9.0
Features
9.0
8.0
Pricing
10.0
8.0
Support
7.0
7.0
Integrations
9.0
8.0
Overall
8.6
8.0
PuckTilda

Our Verdict

PuckWinner

You're looking for a free, open-source editor for React apps with no budget constraints.

More affordable
More features
More integrations
Tilda

Your design team needs a visually appealing website with drag-and-drop ease for a medium project.

Easier to get started

Puck vs Tilda: The Bottom Line

Both Puck and Tilda are strong website builders tools, but they serve different needs. Tilda has a higher user rating (3.9 vs 3.8).

Still unsure? Check the full reviews for Puck and Tilda, explore Puck alternatives, or use our AI search to describe exactly what you need.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Puck or Tilda better?

It depends on your needs. Puck (3.8★) is from $null/mo, while Tilda (3.9★) is from $10/mo. Tilda has a higher user rating.

Can I switch from Puck to Tilda?

Yes. Most SaaS tools offer data export features. Check if Tilda has a migration guide or import tool specifically for Puck users. Many offer onboarding assistance for switchers.

Which is cheaper, Puck or Tilda?

Check the pricing pages of both Puck and Tilda for the most up-to-date pricing information.

What are the main differences between Puck and Tilda?

Puck focuses on drag-and-drop editing and react component-based, while Tilda emphasizes pre-designed block library for quick setup and responsive design for mobile optimization. Both are in the Website Builders category but serve slightly different use cases.