Skip to main content
HomeComparePuck vs Framer (Sites)

Puck vs Framer (Sites)

A detailed comparison to help you choose the right tool for your needs.

Puck logo

Puck

Website Builders

Try Puck
VS
Framer (Sites) logo

Framer (Sites)

Website Builders

Try Framer (Sites)

A
About Puck

Puck is an open-source visual drag-and-drop editor designed specifically for React applications. It allows developers to embed a fully customizable page builder into their existing React or Next.js projects, giving content editors the ability to compose pages visually without writing code. Unlike hosted website builders, Puck is self-hosted, meaning teams retain complete ownership of their data and avoid vendor lock-in. It's particularly well-suited for developer teams who need to provide a CMS-like editing experience while maintaining full control over components, styling, and application architecture.

B
About Framer (Sites)

Framer is a visual website builder that lets designers and creators build responsive, production-ready websites without writing code. It started as a prototyping tool and evolved into a full website publishing platform with a canvas-based editor that feels closer to Figma than traditional page builders. The platform excels at design-forward sites with smooth animations, interactions, and transitions built in. It supports CMS functionality, localization, and custom domain hosting, making it viable for portfolios, marketing sites, and small business websites. It's particularly popular among designers who want pixel-perfect control without handing off to developers.

Pricing Comparison

Tool
Puck
Framer (Sites)
Price
Free (open-source)
Free — From $14/mo
Category
Website Builders
Website Builders
Rating
3.8 (28)
4.2 (120)
Free Plan
No
Yes
Integrations
8+ apps
8+ apps
Founded
2023
2014

Feature Comparison

Feature
Puck
Framer (Sites)
Drag-and-drop editing
React component-based
Next.js App Router support
Custom field types
Inline editing
Responsive preview
Plugin system
Self-hosted
TypeScript support
Zero vendor lock-in
Drag-and-drop design interface
Pre-built responsive templates
Real-time collaboration tools
Custom animations and transitions
Integrated CMS for dynamic content
SEO optimization tools
Custom code injection capabilities

Choose Puck

Open-source visual drag-and-drop editor for React apps

Try Puck Free

Read full review

Choose Framer (Sites)

Easily build and launch responsive websites with Framer.

Try Framer (Sites) Free

Read full review

Not sure which to pick?

Get a personalized recommendation in 10 seconds.

Score Comparison

Ease of Use
8.0
8.0
Features
9.0
8.0
Pricing
10.0
7.0
Support
7.0
6.0
Integrations
9.0
8.0
Overall
8.6
7.4
PuckFramer (Sites)

Our Verdict

PuckWinner

You're looking for a free, open-source editor for React apps with no budget constraints.

More affordable
More features
Better support
Framer (Sites)

You want a design-forward website builder with animations and interactions without code.

Puck vs Framer (Sites): The Bottom Line

Both Puck and Framer (Sites) are strong website builders tools, but they serve different needs. Framer (Sites) has a higher user rating (4.2 vs 3.8).

Still unsure? Check the full reviews for Puck and Framer (Sites), explore Puck alternatives, or use our AI search to describe exactly what you need.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Puck or Framer (Sites) better?

It depends on your needs. Puck (3.8★) is from $null/mo, while Framer (Sites) (4.2★) is free to start. Framer (Sites) has a higher user rating.

Can I switch from Puck to Framer (Sites)?

Yes. Most SaaS tools offer data export features. Check if Framer (Sites) has a migration guide or import tool specifically for Puck users. Many offer onboarding assistance for switchers.

Which is cheaper, Puck or Framer (Sites)?

Check the pricing pages of both Puck and Framer (Sites) for the most up-to-date pricing information.

What are the main differences between Puck and Framer (Sites)?

Puck focuses on drag-and-drop editing and react component-based, while Framer (Sites) emphasizes drag-and-drop design interface and pre-built responsive templates. Both are in the Website Builders category but serve slightly different use cases.