Skip to main content
HomeCompareLinear vs Plane

Linear vs Plane

A detailed comparison to help you choose the right tool for your needs.

Linear logo

Linear

Project Management

Try Linear
VS
Plane logo

Plane

Project Management

Try Plane

A
About Linear

Linear is a streamlined project management and issue tracking tool built specifically for software development teams. It emphasizes speed, keyboard shortcuts, and a clean UI that feels native rather than clunky, setting it apart from heavier tools like Jira. Linear handles everything from bug tracking and sprint planning to product roadmaps, with a focus on keeping workflows fast and distraction-free. It's particularly popular among startups and mid-size engineering teams who value a polished, opinionated approach to project management over endless configurability.

B
About Plane

Plane is an open-source project management platform designed as a modern, cleaner alternative to Jira. It offers issue tracking, sprint cycles, modules, custom views, and product roadmaps — all wrapped in a polished, intuitive interface that feels closer to Linear than legacy tools. Teams can self-host for full data ownership or use Plane's managed cloud offering. It's aimed at software development teams and startups who want powerful project management without the complexity and bloat of enterprise tools. While still maturing compared to established players, Plane's active open-source community and rapid development pace make it a compelling choice for teams comfortable with a newer platform.

Pricing Comparison

Tool
Linear
Plane
Price
From $8/user/mo
Free (open-source) / Pro from $4/user/mo
Category
Project Management
Project Management
Rating
4.6 (315)
3.6 (23)
Free Plan
No
No
Integrations
8+ apps
6+ apps
Founded
2019
2022

Feature Comparison

Feature
Linear
Plane
Fast issue tracking and prioritization
Real-time collaboration with team members
Customizable workflows for projects
Keyboard shortcuts for quick navigation
Integration with GitHub and Slack
Automated project status updates
Issue tracking
Cycles (sprints)
Modules
Roadmaps & timelines
Plane AI assistant
Multiple views (list, board, calendar)
Custom properties
GitHub & GitLab sync
Self-hosted option
API & webhooks

Choose Linear

Linear streamlines project management with fast issue tracking and collaboration tools.

Try Linear Free

Read full review

Choose Plane

Open-source project management alternative to Jira

Try Plane Free

Read full review

Not sure which to pick?

Get a personalized recommendation in 10 seconds.

Score Comparison

Ease of Use
8.0
7.0
Features
8.0
8.0
Pricing
7.0
9.0
Support
7.0
6.0
Integrations
8.0
8.0
Overall
7.6
7.6
LinearPlane

Our Verdict

LinearWinner

Your development team needs fast issue tracking and collaboration tools for agile projects.

Easier to get started
Better support
Plane

You're a small team looking for a cost-effective, open-source alternative to Jira for project management.

More affordable

Linear vs Plane: The Bottom Line

Both Linear and Plane are strong project management tools, but they serve different needs. Linear has a higher user rating (4.6 vs 3.6).

Still unsure? Check the full reviews for Linear and Plane, explore Linear alternatives, or use our AI search to describe exactly what you need.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Linear or Plane better?

It depends on your needs. Linear (4.6★) is from $7/mo, while Plane (3.6★) is from $null/mo. Linear has a higher user rating.

Can I switch from Linear to Plane?

Yes. Most SaaS tools offer data export features. Check if Plane has a migration guide or import tool specifically for Linear users. Many offer onboarding assistance for switchers.

Which is cheaper, Linear or Plane?

Check the pricing pages of both Linear and Plane for the most up-to-date pricing information.

What are the main differences between Linear and Plane?

Linear focuses on fast issue tracking and prioritization and real-time collaboration with team members, while Plane emphasizes issue tracking and cycles (sprints). Both are in the Project Management category but serve slightly different use cases.